Sign In. Research is often a slow process, requiring the careful design, optimization, and replication of experiments. By the time you have accrued enough data to write a manuscript, you will likely want to publish as soon as possible.
Rapid publication can accelerate the dissemination of findings, decrease the likelihood of being scooped, and allow a quicker return to the laboratory to work on the next study. Whether you are currently performing experiments or are in the midst of writing, the following PNAS - Review Speed data may help you to select an efficient and right journal for your manuscripts. The average number of days from manuscript submission to the initial editorial decision on the article.
If your manuscript is rejected by the editor without the peer-reviewed process, please share with the community how many days you got the rejection email from the editor's office.
If your manuscript is sent to reviewers, please share with the community how many days the evaluated process took by editor's office not include the evaluated process of reviewers. How many days did the entire process take?
The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial decision after the first review round only the manuscript with peer-reviewed process.
Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision.
The average number of days from manuscript acceptance to the first appearance of the article online. The average number of days from manuscript submission to the first appearance of the article online. The average number of reviewers during the entire peer-reviewed process include both accepted and rejected manuscript.
Please share your experiences with the community. How many reviewers are in the entire revision process? The average number of external revision rounds during the entire peer-reviewed process include both accepted and rejected manuscript.
How many rounds of external review did you go through? Ranking by Impact Factor. Ranking by Popularity. Register a FREE account. Academic Accelerator. Acceptance Rate.
Impact Factor. Journal Profile. Research Hotspot. Review Speed. Write a Review See All Reviews. Submission To 1 st Editorial Decision Share Your Experiences. Submission To 1 st Revision Report Display journals with at least.
Download data. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Nature Reviews Materials. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Nature Reviews Genetics.
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nature Reviews Cancer. Nature Reviews Immunology. Journal of Political Economy. Chemical Reviews. Nature Genetics. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Nature Methods.
New England Journal of Medicine. The Lancet Oncology. Journal of Finance. Nature Reviews Microbiology. Journal of Statistical Software. Annual Review of Biochemistry.
Sort by: Acceptance Rate
Reviews of Modern Physics.The definition of journal acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to PNAS that was accepted for publication. The acceptance rate for an academic journal is dependent upon the relative demand for publishing in a particular journal, the peer review processes in place, the mix of invited and unsolicited submissions, and time to publication, among others.
As such, it may be a proxy for perceived prestige and demand as compared to availability. However, locating acceptance rates for individual journals or for specific disciplines can be difficult, yet is necessary information for promotion and tenure activities. As an internal benchmark, most journals will not publish their acceptance rates on their website. From their perspective, a consistently low acceptance rate may prove to be a deterrent to future submissions. Moreover, the method of calculating acceptance rates varies among journals.
Some journals use all manuscripts received as a base for computing this rate. Other journals allow the editor to choose which papers are sent to reviewers and calculate the acceptance rate on those that are reviewed that is less than the total manuscripts received.
Also, many editors do not maintain accurate records on this data and provide only a rough estimate. Journal Acceptance Rate Feedback System provides an open, transparent, and straightforward platform to help academic researchers support informed decisions through the wisdom of crowds.
Academic Accelerator displays the exact community-driven data without secret algorithms, hidden factors, or systematic delay. Let us improve the transparency of peer-review process together! Ranking by Impact Factor. Ranking by Popularity. Register a FREE account. Academic Accelerator. Write a Review See All Reviews. Share Your Experiences with Community. Email Share. Journal Acceptance Rate Database.
Message Board. ISSN Academic Accelerator ID. Share with us!Percentage of submitted articles accepted during a calendar year; the total number of articles accepted out of the total number of articles submitted in the same year. The percentage of all articles submitted to this journal in a calendar year that was accepted for publication in the same year.
Both the number of submitted articles and the number of accepted articles are shown, to give a good indication of the size of the journal.
These are analytics and research cookies that allow us to collect information about how visitors use a website, for instance which pages visitors go to most often, and if they get error messages from web pages. This helps us to improve the way the website works and allows us to test different ideas on the site.
To avoid receiving cookies on the browser of your mobile device, you will need to refer to its user manual.
Why I published in PLoS ONE. And why I probably won’t again for awhile.
For information on how to opt-out of cookies set by our suppliers, please visit the applicable links listed in the table above. Biomaterials Acceptance Rate. Acceptance Rate Accepted Submissions.
About Acceptance Rate Percentage of submitted articles accepted during a calendar year; the total number of articles accepted out of the total number of articles submitted in the same year. Legend Acceptance Rate Accepted Submissions. Metrics Year Submissions Accepted Acceptance Rate 14 15 14 15 17 Definition Acceptance Rate The percentage of all articles submitted to this journal in a calendar year that was accepted for publication in the same year.
His primary area of research is cancer genetics and gene therapy. PNAS also has ten associate editors and a large editorial board representing thirty-one branches of science from anthropology to sustainable science. Further details are available here: www. New authors are required to register first. Detailed information on the preparation of manuscripts is available at www. Each paper is assigned to a member of the PNAS Editorial Board from one of the 31 branches or disciplines defined by the journal.
If a contribution passes this initial review, it is then taken over by one of the Member Editors, who may enlist specialist reviewers and evaluates their recommendations. The final decision is taken by the member of the editorial board.
An infographic showing the process in detail is available at www. This bite-sized course will familiarize you with concepts you need to know to…. All covered by our day money back guarantee. PNAS offers quick turn-around times: the initial decision is taken in about 40 days; the average time between acceptance and publication online is one month; and the average time between submission and publication including the print edition is less than 6 months.
PNAS papers can be freely accessed 6 months after publication, and many other types of content are freely available much earlier than that. Instructions to authors: www.
Detailed information on the preparation of manuscripts: www. You're looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey. We like that! Why don't we give you complete access! One click sign-in with your social accounts. Sign up via email. View Comments. This content belongs to the Journal Selection Stage. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage.
Journal Selection Tips. Blood, sweat, and tears: The story behind the paper Blood, sweat, and tears: The story behind the paper.
More on Scientific Reports, And on Faked Papers
Angewandte Chemie: Quick facts and submission tips Angewandte Chemie: Quick facts and submission tips. New model explains unique transport dynamics of… New model explains unique transport dynamics of complex fluids. What are the most common reasons for retraction? Recommended Courses. Articles Popular. PNAS: Quick facts and submission tips. Sep 27, Is my paper likely to be rejected if the status changes are quick?
I have submitted my paper to an open access journal…. What will you learn? Nuances of writing various types of manuscripts Use international checklists for your manuscript Choose a journal that is best for your manuscript.
The reviewers fully understood the paper and their comments really made the paper better. Overall, great review process, fast and efficient. The second round included one more simple reviewer and an even more thorough request for revision from reviewer 1. The modifications made to our submission due to this reviewer 1's comments undoubtedly made the paper significantly better off.
All in all the PNAS submission process, though stressful at times, was a great success! Motivation: It took 14 weeks for the editor to determine it was not a good fit. We requested updates several times through the review process and were ultimately told 12 weeks into the process that the editor had stopped responding to emails. Completely unprofessional management.
Motivation: Took a long time for a desk reject - sat with Editorial Board for over 5 weeks and then the minute it went to Editor was rejected. Generic letter, not helpful.
Motivation: Decision was fast and even though an immediate rejection was decided we did not loose much time. Motivation: Reviewers dedicated much time reviewing the manuscript.
The comments are helpful to further improve the manuscript contents. Motivation: Took 5 weeks to desk-reject with a 1 line justification.The Most Extreme Complex Life in the World
Motivation: It took them 4 weeks to find an editor and another two weeks to find external reviewers. The reviewers' comments were relatively straightforward and useful; it was also evident that the reviewers had a profound understanding of the subject. However, the whole process from submission to rejection was delayed which the editor apologized for in an email and took almost 3 months.